Perpetual Oscillation

“He who despairs of the human condition is a coward, but he who has hope for it is a fool. – Albert Camus

So this quote has been on my WordPress “drafts” for quite a while now, because every time I want to write about this, I lose motivation and decide to not. But every time I come back to this draft and re-read this quote, the more I identify with it – but in opposite ways.

Some days, I’ll be the “he who despairs,” and others, I’ll be the “he who has hope.” And another day, I’ll be neither – somewhere in the middle as I think Camus intended.

It’s funny, because just last night, as I was reading through the numerous articles for my research paper on social entrepreneurship, I came across an article “Social Entrepreneurs and Catalytic Change” by Sandra A. Waddock and James E. Post, in which it discusses who a “catalytic social entrepreneur” is:

“The activities of social entrepreneurs can thus be distinguished from those of other types of public entrepreneurs by 1) the fact that social entrepreneurs are private citizens, not public servants, 2) their focus on raising public awareness of an issue of general public concern, and 3) their hope that increased public attention will result in new solutions eventually emerging…It is this latter aspect that gives rise to the term “catalytic.”

And I guess that is the one problem I have with that description. That is is the hope that may (or may not) result in new solutions.

If there’s anything I’ve discovered in my twenty years, it’s that hope is never enough. Hope can get you through the day, hope can sometimes bring about change, but it never guarantees change. This may be too tied into my own personal beliefs and philosophies, but the way I see it, one can never rely on and hope for others to change. We can try to change people, to change their beliefs and actions, but we can never guarantee it. Again, hope is never enough.

My too-demanding nature often leads to disappointment, because in every way (both on a personal and more global) level, I want that “hope” directed into reality. And so in reading this article, I would conclude that I disagree. If anything, a catalytic social entrepreneur must not hope that public awareness will bring about change: they must guarantee it and be the ones to bring about this change.

Now, is that too much to ask? Am I, too, being too hopeful? Here we go, a classic case of Rosalind-contradicting-herself. I don’t know – you tell me.

More recently than probably the last two years, I’ve become more cynical, more pessimistic once again toward “human nature” or specifically toward politics and existing injustices. I can never reconcile in my mind the fact that injustices will always exist but the fact that they are, as term itself states, unjust. And it’s not enough for me to want to change these injustices (i.e. my desperate – ha – and determined drive to break into social entrepreneurship and somehow succeed) at my present state and time, while instead of learning actual stuff I wished I were learning, I am instead reading other material I find irrelevant. It definitely doesn’t help, either, to be once again reminded of the “politics IS money” perspective which I realized I’ve tried to ignore. It’s one thing to realize this, but it’s another to have to constantly confront it and be okay (or NOT okay, both lead to the same results) with it.

I do know that “little things” count, and that small grassroots movements add up to become huge revolutions. But I’m still waiting for that. And, in a way, I guess I gave up. I lost faith in the “public” grassroots-movement-model and instead am turning to another sector for answers. Am I just too impatient? Do I need to try and stick it through? Am I really just wasting my time?

God, what does it all mean anyway?? What’s the point of it all? I hate my brain sometimes.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  • http://www.insearchofsanuk.com/ Dwight/ดนัย

    This was so refreshing to read. I feel like so few of us are open about being confused or unsure. Anyway, in this quote they’re just talking about distinguishing who are the social entrepreneurs, right? Hope is like the prerequisite for being in this group– you know, the bare minimum. It should probably be “unreasonable” hope if we want to describe the ones who’ll be successful. Be unreasonable Roz and don’t quit hoping!

  • http://www.insearchofsanuk.com Dwight/ดนัย

    This was so refreshing to read. I feel like so few of us are open about being confused or unsure. Anyway, in this quote they’re just talking about distinguishing who are the social entrepreneurs, right? Hope is like the prerequisite for being in this group– you know, the bare minimum. It should probably be “unreasonable” hope if we want to describe the ones who’ll be successful. Be unreasonable Roz and don’t quit hoping!

  • http://pointlessly.org/ Roz

    You know what – I totally love your interpretation of the quote, in application to social entrepreneurs. But it doesn’t make it any easier; having “unreasonable” hope (as you term it) is so difficult to maintain, when the rest of society, for the most part, are most likely more on the “despairing” (if not “uncaring”) side of the spectrum.

  • http://pointlessly.org Roz

    You know what – I totally love your interpretation of the quote, in application to social entrepreneurs. But it doesn’t make it any easier; having “unreasonable” hope (as you term it) is so difficult to maintain, when the rest of society, for the most part, are most likely more on the “despairing” (if not “uncaring”) side of the spectrum.

  • Anonymous

    I really like this post. I agree that hope isn’t enough, especially if it’s not directly connected with action. But I think people say they want change a lot more than they are compelled to create it (or even tolerate it… it’s so easy to get into a comfortable rut!)

    I came across your blog via Twitter. I graduated from Cal three years ago and now I’m living in Beijing. I was a Latin American Studies major and decided to move to China about a week after graduation. I first got interested in social entrepreneurship while studying abroad in Chile, and then I took a Haas seminar on the topic, and have been involved with the field in several different ways since then.

    Your comments about questioning the value of your education also resonate with me. I think that one of the main things I’ve taken away from Cal is an appreciation for multiple perspectives on any given topic. And great friends.

    Go Bears!

  • http://www.twitter.com/leslieforman Leslie Forman

    I really like this post. I agree that hope isn’t enough, especially if it’s not directly connected with action. But I think people say they want change a lot more than they are compelled to create it (or even tolerate it… it’s so easy to get into a comfortable rut!)

    I came across your blog via Twitter. I graduated from Cal three years ago and now I’m living in Beijing. I was a Latin American Studies major and decided to move to China about a week after graduation. I first got interested in social entrepreneurship while studying abroad in Chile, and then I took a Haas seminar on the topic, and have been involved with the field in several different ways since then.

    Your comments about questioning the value of your education also resonate with me. I think that one of the main things I’ve taken away from Cal is an appreciation for multiple perspectives on any given topic. And great friends.

    Go Bears!

  • http://pointlessly.org/ Roz

    Hi Leslie! I’ve followed you on Twitter :)
    It’s good to know that others also feel the way I do. And I agree, that people normally complain (if that’s the right word, haha) about wanting change but actually attempting to bring about change is another story. I think that’s my problem right now, that I don’t quite know where to begin, and that I figured reading and learning about it is the first step. But after that, I’m just kind of stuck.

    It’s great to hear you’re also a fellow Cal Bear! What are you doing in China? Shoot, there was a social entrepreneurship seminar offered? Wished I’d been here for that…

    I’d love to hear about what you’re up to! I will be following your updates on Twitter!

  • http://pointlessly.org Roz

    Hi Leslie! I’ve followed you on Twitter :)
    It’s good to know that others also feel the way I do. And I agree, that people normally complain (if that’s the right word, haha) about wanting change but actually attempting to bring about change is another story. I think that’s my problem right now, that I don’t quite know where to begin, and that I figured reading and learning about it is the first step. But after that, I’m just kind of stuck.

    It’s great to hear you’re also a fellow Cal Bear! What are you doing in China? Shoot, there was a social entrepreneurship seminar offered? Wished I’d been here for that…

    I’d love to hear about what you’re up to! I will be following your updates on Twitter!

  • http://procrastinator.wordpress.com/ Mohit

    I don’t really know where to begin this comment…

    I think the core problem – which we both share – is that we’re interested in EVERYTHING. It’s hard to hone in and really figure out something well if you want to learn this and that and that too. In a lot of ways, we share similar paths – growing up in conservative environment, realizing the injustice around us and wanting to do something about it, unsure of how to best get there, etc. And yet, we’re heading along remarkably different paths – you started with Poli Sci and ended up at Haas, while I started with Poli Sci and ended up with Econ. But, in the end, we’re both interested in social entrepreneurship for the same reason – solving problems in a sustainable manner.

    I disagree about the “unreasonable hope” thing. I don’t think that unreasonable hope is a requirement to be a social entrepreneur. I think (and I’m making assumptions about you here, to be honest) that we’re both interested in social entrepreneurship because the models that exist identify a problem and solve it in a direct, efficient, and effective manner. The problem with unreasonable hope is that we expect every solution to address global poverty. If you look at the most effective social entrepreneurs though, they look at a core problem, and address it in a very specific way. Unreasonable hope is a great motivator, but in the end, you have to figure out the problem you want to solve and how you can best make people understand why it needs to be solved. Making that decision isn’t easy – definitely not for me and I’m sure not for you – but that doesn’t make it unimportant.

    Not sure if my comment is even related to your post, but that’s kind of what I started thinking about after reading your post. Well-written, though :)

  • http://procrastinator.wordpress.com Mohit

    I don’t really know where to begin this comment…

    I think the core problem – which we both share – is that we’re interested in EVERYTHING. It’s hard to hone in and really figure out something well if you want to learn this and that and that too. In a lot of ways, we share similar paths – growing up in conservative environment, realizing the injustice around us and wanting to do something about it, unsure of how to best get there, etc. And yet, we’re heading along remarkably different paths – you started with Poli Sci and ended up at Haas, while I started with Poli Sci and ended up with Econ. But, in the end, we’re both interested in social entrepreneurship for the same reason – solving problems in a sustainable manner.

    I disagree about the “unreasonable hope” thing. I don’t think that unreasonable hope is a requirement to be a social entrepreneur. I think (and I’m making assumptions about you here, to be honest) that we’re both interested in social entrepreneurship because the models that exist identify a problem and solve it in a direct, efficient, and effective manner. The problem with unreasonable hope is that we expect every solution to address global poverty. If you look at the most effective social entrepreneurs though, they look at a core problem, and address it in a very specific way. Unreasonable hope is a great motivator, but in the end, you have to figure out the problem you want to solve and how you can best make people understand why it needs to be solved. Making that decision isn’t easy – definitely not for me and I’m sure not for you – but that doesn’t make it unimportant.

    Not sure if my comment is even related to your post, but that’s kind of what I started thinking about after reading your post. Well-written, though :)

  • http://procrastinator.wordpress.com/ Mohit

    Oh I forgot. I really liked this part…

    “I lost faith in the “public” grassroots-movement-model and instead am turning to another sector for answers. Am I just too impatient? Do I need to try and stick it through? Am I really just wasting my time?”

    I think it’s really interesting that you mentioned that. I went to a bunch of organizing trainings this summer, and I’m very interested and involved in organizing during my time at Cal. But I’m one of the few people who’s also interested in social entrepreneurship. My main draw to it is the sustainability aspect of it.

    But the more I think about it, the more I realize that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Just like your post talks about, social entrepreneurship can solve a problem, but that’s fruitless unless people understand it and know how to prevent it from happening again. I think that organizing doesn’t just solve problems, but empowers people to solve them. A social business or some similar entity that understands people and can work with them to solve a problem – all while doing it in a financially beneficial/sustainable manner – has a LOT of potential.

  • http://procrastinator.wordpress.com Mohit

    Oh I forgot. I really liked this part…

    “I lost faith in the “public” grassroots-movement-model and instead am turning to another sector for answers. Am I just too impatient? Do I need to try and stick it through? Am I really just wasting my time?”

    I think it’s really interesting that you mentioned that. I went to a bunch of organizing trainings this summer, and I’m very interested and involved in organizing during my time at Cal. But I’m one of the few people who’s also interested in social entrepreneurship. My main draw to it is the sustainability aspect of it.

    But the more I think about it, the more I realize that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Just like your post talks about, social entrepreneurship can solve a problem, but that’s fruitless unless people understand it and know how to prevent it from happening again. I think that organizing doesn’t just solve problems, but empowers people to solve them. A social business or some similar entity that understands people and can work with them to solve a problem – all while doing it in a financially beneficial/sustainable manner – has a LOT of potential.

  • http://pointlessly.org/ Roz

    When you put it that way (with the “unreasonable hope” thing), yeah – you’re right! I agree with you. And we definitely do share that problem of being interested in everything, and wanting to do something about so many injustices… That is definitely my problem.. haha.

    And in response to the organizing part of your comment, again I do agree, that it does empower people to solve problems. But I think for me, my problem was that in organizing and grassroots efforts, we mainly targeted achieving social change through the political process, and that I somewhat lost faith that way. Of course, in the other more local organizing experience that I had, I’m not saying it was bad or that I had a bad experience. I definitely learned a lot, but I think after almost 1.5 years of doing it, I realized certain inefficiencies in the model/method and that’s why I turned to social business.

    This is a problem I’m addressing in my social entrepreneurship research paper that i’m currently writing, but the more I look into it, the more I (once again) realize that yeah, it isn’ t mutually exclusive.

    I’m not really sure where I’m going with this comment either, haha, but I’m glad you enjoyed my post, Mohit! And it’s really awesome to know we are both interested in this!

  • http://pointlessly.org Roz

    When you put it that way (with the “unreasonable hope” thing), yeah – you’re right! I agree with you. And we definitely do share that problem of being interested in everything, and wanting to do something about so many injustices… That is definitely my problem.. haha.

    And in response to the organizing part of your comment, again I do agree, that it does empower people to solve problems. But I think for me, my problem was that in organizing and grassroots efforts, we mainly targeted achieving social change through the political process, and that I somewhat lost faith that way. Of course, in the other more local organizing experience that I had, I’m not saying it was bad or that I had a bad experience. I definitely learned a lot, but I think after almost 1.5 years of doing it, I realized certain inefficiencies in the model/method and that’s why I turned to social business.

    This is a problem I’m addressing in my social entrepreneurship research paper that i’m currently writing, but the more I look into it, the more I (once again) realize that yeah, it isn’ t mutually exclusive.

    I’m not really sure where I’m going with this comment either, haha, but I’m glad you enjoyed my post, Mohit! And it’s really awesome to know we are both interested in this!